As a scientific reflection of today's "globalization", current studies in global history deal with the worldwide influence of former empire nations such as Great Britain or France. The classic studies on the Habsburg era have so far largely ignored the global impact of the former Austro-Hungarian monarchy. This is where the present publication, written from the viewpoint of a global architectural history, comes in. A major blind spot in existing research is Austria-Hungary’s participation in the "International Settlement" of Tientsin (today Tianjin/China), where, as one of nine nations, it planned its own trading settlement ("concession") from 1900 onwards. The First World War brought this episode to an abrupt end.
The present book pursues the approach of linking historical insights with questions of contemporary relevance. The main part deals with the urban planning and architectural implementation of the Austro-Hungarian Concession in Tientsin (1901-1917), bringing to light more than 200 historical maps, sketches, plans, and photographs of previously unknown archival material. It then examines the strategies of the city government of present-day Tianjin to promote the architectural relics of the imperialist era as Chinese cultural heritage. In addition, an introduction (by Georg Lehner) sheds light on the historical process of rapprochement of Austria(-Hungary) with the “Middle Kingdom” over the 19th century, while an extensive appendix provides further valuable visual sources and references.
Supported by: Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF) - Selbstständige Publikationen
Supported by: DDr. Franz-Josef Mayer-Gunthof Wissenschafts- und Forschungsstiftung der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
»In the opening pages of his richly documented book on the history of the Austro-Hungarian concession in Tianjin, Michael Falser recalls to what extent research on the European ‘concessions’ in late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century Chinese cities is currently both abundant and fragmented.
(...)
However, the book stands out from most of the current literature on concessions for a few reasons, the first of which originates from the specific character of its object.
(...)
In this respect, the book presents itself as an invitation to counter such trends by promoting stronger historical knowledge of the existing built environment and by renewing close research collaborations between European and Chinese experts.
https://brill.com/view/journals/ejea/22/3/article-p339_8.xml«
European Journal of East Asian Studies 22 geschrieben von Filippo De Pieri und Beini Guo